The principles of the animal testing from the human perspective

Against animal testing articles 2018

For example, the U. More complex markers of psychological distress have also been described in animals. Justifying Animal Experimentation: The Starting Point, in Why Animal Experimentation Matters: The Use of Animals in Medical Research, If those human subjects were normal and able to give free and informed consent to the experiment then this might not be morally objectionable. The ethical challenge to conducting animal research is balancing the gains in scientific knowledge with the costs to animals, especially in terms of pain and distress. The NRC vision calls for a shift away from animal use in chemical testing toward computational models and high-throughput and high-content in vitro methods. These reviews have raised questions about whether human diseases inflicted upon animals sufficiently mimic the disease processes and treatment responses seen in humans. Varying forms of depression have been repeatedly reported in animals, including nonhuman primates, dogs, pigs, cats, birds and rodents, among others [32] — [34]. Peter Singer, Animal Liberation, Avon, Sadly, there are a number of examples where researchers have been prepared to experiment on human beings in ways that should not have been permitted on animals. This success hinges on the fact that humans and animals share many physiological and genetic similarities, especially mammals. This collection aims to spur further steps forward toward a more coherent ethical framework for scientific advancement. While animal testing may be considered unethical by some, it is an indispensable part of the research process. In the case of vaccines, this system can be used at every stage, including in vitro disease models, antigen selection and adjuvant effects, safety testing, clinical trials, manufacturing, and potency assays.

Predictive Value of Animal Data and the Impact of Technical Innovations on Animal Use In the last decade, concerns have mounted about how relevant animal experiments are to human health outcomes.

To the undecided and non-prejudiced the answer is, of course, obvious.

If the suffering of individual animals can be reduced significantly through the use of a larger number of animals, the reduction of individual suffering shall take priority over the reduction of the number of animals used in the experiment. Competing interests: HRF and NB are employed by Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, which is a non-governmental organization which promotes higher ethical standards in research and alternatives to the use of animals in research, education, and training. Suspicions around the use of humans were deepened with the revelation of several exploitive research projects, including a series of medical experiments on large numbers of prisoners by the Nazi German regime during World War II and the Tuskegee syphilis study. This may cause harm to human beings because they won't benefit from a cure for their disease because the cure won't be developed. This collection aims to spur further steps forward toward a more coherent ethical framework for scientific advancement. Most ethicists think that we have a greater moral responsibility for the things we do than for the things we fail to do; i. It would also be obvious to a normal 12 year old child As an asthmatic, Zaim says he owes much of his good health to the animal research behind inhalers. In the animal experiment context, if the experiment takes place, the experimenter will carry out actions that harm the animals involved. Analysis and Discussion Ethical Considerations and Advances in the Understanding of Animal Cognition Apprehension around burgeoning medical research in the late s and the first half of the 20th century sparked concerns over the use of humans and animals in research [14] , [15].

To avoid unnecessary suffering, clearly-defined criteria must be defined, according to which animals shall be killed as soon as possible and stocks shall not be developed further. For example, fear operates in a less organized subcortical neural circuit than pain, and it has been described in a wide variety of species [31].

Animals share genetic, neuroanatomical, and physiological similarities with humans, and many animals express pain in ways similar to humans. Lack of regulatory harmony, evolving regulations and guidelines, and cultural differences can add to the challenge. There are those who irrationally believe that animal testing should not take place, citing species differences. Excerpts from the U. Ethical self-examination involves a careful self-analysis of one's own personal and scientific motives. Any permission to use the codes must be sought from the individual organizations directly. Despite the attention brought to this issue by Russell and Burch, the number of animals used in research and testing has continued to increase. It can't be used to defend all forms of experimentation since there are some forms of suffering that are probably impossible to justify even if the benefits are exceptionally valuable to humanity. Thus, in the context of animal experiments, they cannot evade the ethical conflict that arises between the desire for new insights and the basic ethical position of "respect for life". Standards describe the desired outcome, but allow flexibility in achieving the outcome. This study, which began in , could not have been accomplished with animal research [55]. Ethical objections to the use of animals have been publically voiced for more than a century, well before there was a firm scientific understanding of animal emotion and cognition [15]. If a drug passes the animal test it's then tested on a small human group before large scale clinical trials. Recent estimates suggest that at least million animals are used each year worldwide [2].

A draft was released for comment in April and the final draft is expected in Analysis and Discussion Ethical Considerations and Advances in the Understanding of Animal Cognition Apprehension around burgeoning medical research in the late s and the first half of the 20th century sparked concerns over the use of humans and animals in research [14][15].

Such testing saves numerous animal species from environmental harm and extinction.

The principles of the animal testing from the human perspective

Thanks to the continuous efforts of scientists around the world who conduct animal and human studies, further advancements — benefitting asthma patients and those suffering from various other diseases- can continue. Competing interests: HRF and NB are employed by Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, which is a non-governmental organization which promotes higher ethical standards in research and alternatives to the use of animals in research, education, and training.

Resource limitations might require a strategic approach that emphasizes diseases with the greatest public health threats, which increasingly fall within the scope of preventable diseases.

an example of reduction in animal research is

That is true, which is why Drug D would be given as a single, very small dose to human volunteers under tightly controlled and regulated conditions.

Rated 5/10 based on 15 review
Download
Animal Testing: Humane Research from a Human Perspective